Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > FreeForAll
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2018, 12:34 PM
Gus's Avatar
Gus Gus is offline
7/21/61
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 2,221
Default A novel cluster igniter at WSMC

Oh how we miss Q2G2's!

Just got back from the World Spacemodeling Contest in Poland and wanted to share something our British friends came up with.

For the S2P Precision Fragile Payload event the goal is to fly a raw egg to 300 meters with a flight duration of 60 seconds. Three flights, total is added, egg compartment is only opened after the 3rd flight. Very similar to TARC except that there are 3 flights and no construction requirements, any motor and rocket combo is OK. Huge fun.

The Brits entered two teams (3 guys each) and finished first and second as teams, 1st and 3rd individual. (I finished 4th, 0.3 seconds out of 3rd, ouch, LOL). Tremendous consistency and reliablity and solid design.

But what was really interesting is that the Brits flew 3 motor clusters of Estes D12's with a really novel ignition system. In the S2P event most of the foreign flyers do not have access to either Estes or Aerotech motors (which is what the U.S. flew). The Brits had great Estes motors but not such great cluster igniters, so they came up with their own.

Basically, the Brits used cellophane quickmatch to tie together what looked like fireworks fuse in each of the 3 motors. Fuses were held in by split Estes white igniter plugs. Quickmatch connected the 3 fuses and was electrically ignited by an Estes igniter. Really clever, really consistent, and really reliable.

After the contest the Brits flew a goofy 4 engine cluster rocket made out of rubbish. I got a nice picture of the igniter system and the rocket with all 4 motors ignited (below).

Just thought you folks would appreciate how our British friends successfully stretched the envelope!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Cluster.jpg
Views: 186
Size:  411.3 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  BritFuse.jpeg
Views: 169
Size:  255.6 KB  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2018, 12:59 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,418
Default

Hilarious pics.
Instead of "Egg Lofting" that cold be known as "Trash Lofting".
Almost as fun as BOWLIN' BALL Lofting.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2018, 02:47 PM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,604
Default

It was allowed at WSMC, yet I was crucified for even talking about flash pan ignition on TRF. There isn't even much difference in the amount of BP used....unless you just like to see big fireballs and scorched rocket tails!

Now I'll have to build myself a separated cluster to play with. Classic green cannon fuse burn rate is about 20s/ft to 30s/ft according to brand, IIRC. I believe the pink thermalite I used to have was about 20s/ft.

With that cannon fuse for the final ignition phase, timing might not be perfect. A good stiff decent length rod, rail, or tower would be a good idea. Not that it's ever a bad idea.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-15-2018, 05:24 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,418
Default

The shorter the pieces of cannon fuse you use the closer the ignition time of each motor will be.
Back in the 80s/90s I used cannon fuse exclusively for igniton of all non-clustered flights. I NEVER had a failure to ignite the motor. Far more reliable than solar igniters.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2018, 05:43 PM
olDave olDave is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
Default We need some official NAR definition of what is allowable

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbzep
.......yet I was crucified for even talking about flash pan ignition ......


IfI am reading that picture correctly, that cellophane quickmatch fills that whole outer circle? Does that stuff really burn fast enough to ignite all the individual motor fuzes simultaneously? (or nearly so?)

Here in the USA, possession and/or use of loose black powder for anything other than a firearm seems to get you immediately into trouble with local authorities who are generally unfamiliar with rocketry. We could sure use some clarification from the NAR, citing specific federal statutes, and an additional letter of approval from the ATF wouldn't hurt. It is already OK to use BP for ejection charges, but even THAT application raises the eyebrows of the police. We need some legal help in this area before our hobby gets strangled even more.

(As far as crucified on TRF, just consider the source, most of those people don't know what used to be allowed in NAR competition or what is legally allowed to be done under current laws, all they care about is how big a motor they can find in a sparky version and how much fiberglass they can plaster onto a rocket)
__________________
NAR 20602
used to be "powderburner" in another life
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2018, 05:51 PM
olDave olDave is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
Default And about that cluster---

Those outboard motor locations seem (to me, at least) to be unnecessarily spread apart. Maybe I don't understand whatever configuration limitation required this, but it looks borderline unsafe to me.

One late ignition, or one failed ignition, and that thing looks like it would be prone to cartwheeling above the end of the launch rod/rail. A healthy dose of extra launch rod/rail length would seem to be indicated.

If I was serving as RSO, that rocket would be assigned to an "away" pad.
__________________
NAR 20602
used to be "powderburner" in another life
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2018, 03:48 PM
vcp vcp is offline
Intermediate Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olDave
... all they care about is how big a motor they can find in a sparky version and how much fiberglass they can plaster onto a rocket)


That cracked me up.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2018, 03:58 PM
Jerry Irvine's Avatar
Jerry Irvine Jerry Irvine is offline
Freeform rocketry advocate.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Claremont, CA "The intellectual capitol of the world."-WSJ
Posts: 3,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbzep
It was allowed at WSMC, yet I was crucified for even talking about flash pan ignition on TRF. There isn't even much difference in the amount of BP used....unless you just like to see big fireballs and scorched rocket tails!

Now I'll have to build myself a separated cluster to play with. Classic green cannon fuse burn rate is about 20s/ft to 30s/ft according to brand, IIRC. I believe the pink thermalite I used to have was about 20s/ft.

With that cannon fuse for the final ignition phase, timing might not be perfect. A good stiff decent length rod, rail, or tower would be a good idea. Not that it's ever a bad idea.
Old Skewl.
http://www.v-serv.com/crp/pubs/US%2...RTS%201-2-3.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2018, 08:38 PM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olDave
(As far as crucified on TRF, just consider the source, most of those people don't know what used to be allowed in NAR competition or what is legally allowed to be done under current laws, all they care about is how big a motor they can find in a sparky version and how much fiberglass they can plaster onto a rocket)

While that's true, it was somebody that flies tiny rockets and takes tiny pictures that started the flogging, then a bunch of lemmings chipped in their blind support.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2018, 03:14 AM
Leo's Avatar
Leo Leo is offline
German Model Rocket Builder
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gus
...

Just got back from the World Spacemodeling Contest in Poland and wanted to share something our British friends came up with.

...

What they came up with is actually a product from Raketenmodellbau Klima GmbH

Tape Match

I don't why the brits used wicks. For instant ignition in conjunction with the tape match you would use these:

Igniter sticks

I fly all my cluster in this manner...



... be it single stage or multi stage rockets.



Ignition is super fast and very reliable.

Here an example video of the startup ignition in slow motion:

Click me video
__________________
Leo

My rocket fleet and more @ Leo's Leisure Site and on YouTube - My latest project: ALTDuino
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024