#41
|
||||
|
||||
Let me expand upon my comments.
If anyone was to make copies of the overweight plastic rockets in question, they would expose themselves to massive laibility. They barely flew on the C6 motors sold back "then". The current C6 motors from China will not lift them. The risk of crash/fire/injury is huge. Now, if someone wants to make plastic models that can only sit on a shelf with no internal components so that they canot be flown, then you can safely sell a dozen or two plastic models to the market.
__________________
-Fred Shecter NAR 20117 (L2) Southern California Rocket Association, NAR Section 430 |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Couldn't they be sold with motor mounts to fly on composites or clusters? Are the Estes black powder engines the only things that could work? Having an "Artisan" line that is skill-level 6 and has unique propulsion requirements seems reasonable from a non-economic point-of-view, at least. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Missing, by an enormous margin, Fred's central point: Not demonstrated to be commercially practical.
All these laments about what is or isn't available from the marketplace accomplish nothing to change the lamented situation. The fact that no one and no company is stepping up to fill the mythical needs of a very small number of people indicates the continued lamenting isn't grounded in reality. Cast resin in model railroading, a much larger market, is dying due to the quality of products that are being bought from large manufacturers, bought even by those who have sustained the cast resin market for decades. Recognizing the gap between what can be done and what is commercially viable would be a good first step to a better life for all the lamenters. Quote:
__________________
Peter Olivola (polivola@gmail.com) |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The originals were horrible. The central tube was small and barely fit a parachute. The chute, shock cord would often get scorched/melted/broken by ejection gasses and flaming bits because there is not much room for wadding. Composite motors will make that worse. AND they will melt the outer plastic body. And, when the inevitable 'smart' consumer installs a D21-10 instead of a D21-4 motor (because a '10' is more powerful than a '4'), the heavy plastic rocket will crash from a high altitude and the momentum and hard plastic will recreate the Cox/Estes X-15 near-fatality.
__________________
-Fred Shecter NAR 20117 (L2) Southern California Rocket Association, NAR Section 430 |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I agree with this, but having said that, there are "labor of love" products that do appear for hobbies, but you are right in that we cannot expect a company to do these. in the free flight community there are people that do beginner free flight kits at very low volumes, basically as a service and because they enjoy it, not because they expect anything. There are also low-volume "short" kits that do this. But expecting someone that is trying to feed themselves, or even support their hobby, to do this for money is probably unrealistic. (And I say probably because I may be wrong about the market size.) |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511 All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com. NAR #54895 SR |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Here's a little bit more information about the new MPC Star Trek model rocket kits:
http://trekmovie.com/2012/03/21/fir...g-in-september/ Leave it to a Trek site to have the information.
__________________
Bob S.A.M. # 0014 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|