Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > The Golden Age of Model Rocketry > Model Rocket History
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:25 PM
Rex R Rex R is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Default big bertha nose cone question

if anyone should happen to have a big bertha with a balsa NC...would you be so kind as to measure the length? thanks
reason I ask is I ordered a bnc60L from semroc thinking that the plastic noses were essentially the same as the balsa as far as shape and measuremt go....looks like I need to do some digging.
rex
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:14 PM
Rex R Rex R is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Default

after doing some research, I've found that, a) the classic goony bird nc is exactly the same shape and length as the current bertha nc, b) the fins on the current big bertha are approx 0.5" longer than the original fins, c) the original nc was indeed a 0.5" longer than the current version, d) the nc60L had shrunk by 1974, oops.
rex
edit
the current version nc bertha/goonybird is listed as semroc BNC60LP
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:34 PM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Default

The current shape is duplicated with the SEMROC BNC-60MS, while their BNC-60L is a correct-shape copy of the earlier Estes original. If you're trying to duplicate the original BB, use the SEMROC BNC-60L...

[Addendum] The SEMROC BNC-60LP is a new release, but the 60MS is an elliptical and seems to more closely match the ones I received in both the BB and Baby Bertha kit bags...

There are, IIRC, at least three, and possibly four, sets of fins for the Big Bertha (and her cluster-engined sibling, the Ranger). The fin shape changed slightly each time. The earliest shape/size can be found on the DOM plan sheet #13, which pre-dates the kit release. Here is the JimZ link to that plan.
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:51 PM
Rex R Rex R is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Default

well the rocket only has to look sort of like a big bertha...people are not going to get a good look at it once the G67(38/120) comes up to pressure....
rex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-2012, 02:54 PM
chadrog's Avatar
chadrog chadrog is offline
Out to launch...
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Milwaukee WI
Posts: 1,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex R
well the rocket only has to look sort of like a big bertha...people are not going to get a good look at it once the G67(38/120) comes up to pressure....
rex

That's pretty much what I was thinking.
__________________
www.wooshrocketry.org NAR Sec. 558
Look us up on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/guytogo75?feature=mhee
unstable by design
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-07-2012, 10:06 AM
Carl@Semroc's Avatar
Carl@Semroc Carl@Semroc is offline
Junior ??? Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Knightdale, NC
Posts: 1,470
Default

...and the BNC-60LV is a copy of Vern's original Big Bertha, which probably pre-dates all the plans for the Big Bertha. It was more than likely pulled from the BNC-60L bin used to kit the Rangers at the time. We use the BNC-60LV in our Retro-Repro Ranger.

Vern's Big Bertha has been flown several hundred times from what I understand. The nose cone still looks like it was not been replaced or sanded since it was first painted. The fins have rounded tips, probably from some rough landings and subsequent sanding. The parachute looks to be the original 12" x 12" square black plastic sheet, but the shock cord mount has been replaced several times and currently has the tri-fold used first on the Alpha years later.

There is no engine hook, but Vern left the engine with a 3/8" or so overhang so he could wrap a few turns of masking tape around the bottom of the engine tube and exposed engine tube. Simple, but elegant.
__________________
Carl McLawhorn
NAR#4717 L2
semroc.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-07-2012, 06:02 PM
Rex R Rex R is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Default

hmmm guess the shape etc. gradually changed due to wear on the cutters then was set in plastic. thanks for the info.
rex
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024