Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > FreeForAll
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2013, 10:19 PM
kurtschachner's Avatar
kurtschachner kurtschachner is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southeastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,243
Default F-1B - Bringing the F-1 Back to Life

A pretty good article about the work done to model and characterize the F-1 engine in preparation for designing an F-1B. The part about CAD modeling is cool:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013...t-back-to-life/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2013, 06:32 AM
Gus's Avatar
Gus Gus is offline
7/21/61
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 2,235
Default

Kurt,
Thanks for posting this. Really fascinating.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2013, 07:59 AM
kurtschachner's Avatar
kurtschachner kurtschachner is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southeastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,243
Default

What also was interesting was the mention of the highly mechanical controls on the engine (as opposed to electronic), as well as the description of the massive number of handmade welds.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2013, 12:37 PM
modeltrains's Avatar
modeltrains modeltrains is offline
Intermediate Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Farm burg along Missouri River
Posts: 54
Default

And that's an interesting tidbit of trivia too, ""[T]he power output of the Saturn first stage was 60 gigawatts. This happens to be very similar to the peak electricity demand of the United Kingdom.""

Interesting reading this with background sound of Amish carriage heading down the road out back.

Last edited by modeltrains : 04-15-2013 at 01:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2013, 12:47 PM
Gus's Avatar
Gus Gus is offline
7/21/61
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 2,235
Default

The discussion of the turbofan exhaust and the accompanying article about the plans for the F1-B were what really intrigued me. Especially the info about the parts reduction from over 5000 to ~100.

The discussion in the accompanying article about relative propellant densities and the politics of rocket and motor sales was also fascinating.

Really interesting articles.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2013, 01:19 PM
kurtschachner's Avatar
kurtschachner kurtschachner is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southeastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,243
Default

I never knew that the dark appearance to the F-1 flame was due to the turbine exhaust. I always thought it was an artifact of the photography or something else.

That second article is here in case anyone is interested:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013...-lbs-of-thrust/

The ability to model the combustion is huge. In Murray and Cox’s Apollo: Race to the Moon they devote (IIRC) a whole chapter to the development of the F-1 and how combustion instability nearly scuttled the project. Combustion instability in rocket engines was well known before the development of the F-1 but it was worse in this engine due to its size. No one really knew what caused it and the way it was cured was to use baffles (as described in that article) to dampen the pressure waves. The F-1 was dynamically unstable such that when instabilities in the combustion occurred, the engine tended to amplify them rather than dampen. This led to a rapid and catastrophic failure of the engine. Worse yet, the instabilities were random and during testing and development, some engines operated for very long cycles with no problems. Other times the engines became unstable and self-destructed in short order.

The engineers knew they needed baffles in the engine but in order to test different arrangements, but they also realized they needed to trigger a combustion instability on command rather than waiting for one to spontaneously appear. They designed a small bomb that could be placed into an operating F-1 and detonated on command. This generated the needed pressure wave to initiate an instability in the combustion chamber and the response of the engine could then be observed. Eventually through a lot of trial and error an arrangement of baffles (as seen in that picture) was obtained that allowed the engine to be dynamically stable and dampen out the instabilities by itself. But still, no one knew why they were happening and at the time there was no way to model the engine to find out why.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2013, 01:38 PM
GregGleason's Avatar
GregGleason GregGleason is offline
U.S. Manned Space Program Buff
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,298
Default

That was a great article. Like it was written for us.

The welds. So many welds, and beautiful welds. I'm not a welder, but from what I know you have to REALLY good to get a good, consistent weld bead.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2013, 05:27 PM
Ironnerd's Avatar
Ironnerd Ironnerd is offline
Bona-Fide Space Hero
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ATL
Posts: 718
Default

That was a good read! Wow!
__________________
John Adams
"There is a lot of rocketry under 20ns"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2013, 07:07 PM
Ltvscout Ltvscout is offline
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 6,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurtschachner
A pretty good article about the work done to model and characterize the F-1 engine in preparation for designing an F-1B. The part about CAD modeling is cool:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013...t-back-to-life/

Cool stuff, Maynard.
__________________
Scott D. Hansen
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe - Your One Stop BAR Shoppe!
Ye Olde Rocket Plans - OOP Rocket Plans From 38 Companies!
Ye Olde Rocket Forum
WOOSH NAR Section #558
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2013, 07:41 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurtschachner
I never knew that the dark appearance to the F-1 flame was due to the turbine exhaust. I always thought it was an artifact of the photography or something else.

That second article is here in case anyone is interested:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013...-lbs-of-thrust/

The ability to model the combustion is huge. In Murray and Cox’s Apollo: Race to the Moon they devote (IIRC) a whole chapter to the development of the F-1 and how combustion instability nearly scuttled the project. Combustion instability in rocket engines was well known before the development of the F-1 but it was worse in this engine due to its size. No one really knew what caused it and the way it was cured was to use baffles (as described in that article) to dampen the pressure waves. The F-1 was dynamically unstable such that when instabilities in the combustion occurred, the engine tended to amplify them rather than dampen. This led to a rapid and catastrophic failure of the engine. Worse yet, the instabilities were random and during testing and development, some engines operated for very long cycles with no problems. Other times the engines became unstable and self-destructed in short order.

The engineers knew they needed baffles in the engine but in order to test different arrangements, but they also realized they needed to trigger a combustion instability on command rather than waiting for one to spontaneously appear. They designed a small bomb that could be placed into an operating F-1 and detonated on command. This generated the needed pressure wave to initiate an instability in the combustion chamber and the response of the engine could then be observed. Eventually through a lot of trial and error an arrangement of baffles (as seen in that picture) was obtained that allowed the engine to be dynamically stable and dampen out the instabilities by itself. But still, no one knew why they were happening and at the time there was no way to model the engine to find out why.


Kurt-

That is a great book......for those who may not have read it, it is basically devoted to the 'ground' details of the Apollo program such as the engineers, designers, mission control, etc. VERY little mention of the astronauts, which is a nice departure from a portion of the Apollo program that has been covered ad nauseum by other writers.

Though their book is over 20 years old now (I think it came out in '89 to coincide with the 20th anniversary of Apollo 11), it still is a great read today.

And that chapter on the F-1 was great. They say that main engineer from North American or Rocketdyne (Castinholz....or something similar) basically gave his life on the F1 engine problems. I think he died of a heart attack shortly after the problems were finally solved.

Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970

Last edited by Earl : 04-15-2013 at 11:47 PM. Reason: Spellin'
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024