Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > The Golden Age of Model Rocketry > Kit Collecting
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-27-2018, 12:19 AM
A Fish Named Wallyum A Fish Named Wallyum is offline
BP Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ft. Thomas, KY
Posts: 8,617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeR
I sure was surprised! I immediately went to the What’s New section of their website. I guess it needs to pass all the flight testing before it goes onto that page, but the “... kit due to be released soon” was what surprised me.

Yeah, I gave it two or three good reads before I posted it. I've jumped the gun before and wound up landing in something fragrant.
__________________
Bill Eichelberger
NAR 79563

http://wallyum.blogspot.com/

I miss being SAM 0058

Build floor: Centuri Design Contest F-150 Hurricane Estes - Low Boom SST Semroc - Marauder, Shrike, SST Shuttle

In paint: Canaroc Starfighter Scorpion Estes F-22 Air Superiority Fighter, Multi-Roc, Solar Sailer II Semroc Cyber III

Ready to fly: Estes - Solar Sailer II Semroc - Earmark, Groonie Der V 1/2
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-27-2018, 07:19 AM
astronwolf's Avatar
astronwolf astronwolf is offline
Lost his Drifter
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket.aero
No one - not a single soul - asked me where this model came from. Several people picked it up and examined it, but no one guessed that it was a genuine Estes pre-production model.

I was in the audience. You were presenting your experience with building the LJ1. You showed a bunch of models, and the assumption was that the models came from..... you. I vaguely recall that you said one model was a loaner.
__________________
-Wolfram v. Kiparski
NAR 28643 - TRA 15520
MTMA Section #606 President
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-27-2018, 04:23 PM
jeffyjeep's Avatar
jeffyjeep jeffyjeep is offline
Old Submariner
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Home of Wayne & Garth
Posts: 7,771
Default

Not to nitpick, but isn't "Little Joe I" actually a misnomer? Sort of like WWI was never called WWI until there was a second "war to end all wars". I believe it was just called the "Great War". So, was the Little Joe I simply called "Little Joe" or the Mercury Little Joe?
__________________
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.

4 out of 3 people struggle with math.

Chemically, alcohol IS a solution.

NAR# 94042
SAM# 0078
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-27-2018, 04:38 PM
BARGeezer BARGeezer is offline
Avid Builder
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 610
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffyjeep
Not to nitpick, but isn't "Little Joe I" actually a misnomer? Sort of like WWI was never called WWI until there was a second "war to end all wars". I believe it was just called the "Great War". So, was the Little Joe I simply called "Little Joe" or the Mercury Little Joe?


An astute observation. I believe the correct name is "Little Joe". At least per Wikipedia.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-27-2018, 05:11 PM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BARGeezer
An astute observation. I believe the correct name is "Little Joe". At least per Wikipedia.
It's a retroactive name, if not a retronym (like how number-dial watches and clocks came to be called analog watches and clocks after digital watches and clocks came into common use). For example, before the Titan II ICBM came along, its predecessor--which is now called the Titan I--was just called "Titan." (Books and magazine articles that cover the original kerolox ICBM, such as the July 1962 "Popular Science" issue's article, "Underground with the Terrible Titan" [see: http://books.google.com/books?id=Ii...20Titan&f=false ], use the un-numbered name "Titan," although this article mentions the then-upcoming "Type II Titans"--and also uses the term "Titan II"--on page 174 [the first Titan II test flight occurred in March of 1962, but it didn't become operational until 1963].)
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-27-2018, 05:18 PM
Doug Sams's Avatar
Doug Sams Doug Sams is offline
Old Far...er...Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Plano, TX resident since 1998.
Posts: 3,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackshire
It's a retroactive name, if not a retronym (like how number-dial watches and clocks came to be called analog watches and clocks after digital watches and clocks came into common use). For example, before the Titan II ICBM came along, its predecessor--which is now called the Titan I--was just called "Titan." (Books and magazine articles that cover the original kerolox ICBM, such as the July 1962 "Popular Science" issue's article, "Underground with the Terrible Titan" [see: http://books.google.com/books?id=Ii...20Titan&f=false ], use the un-numbered name [the first Titan II test flight occurred in March of 1962, but it didn't become operational until 1963].)
It's sort of like the use of SR at the end of someone's name who has a son named Junior. It's an added attribute for the sake of clarity.

In this case, the inexactness makes it easier to understand.

Doug

.
__________________
YORF member #11
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-27-2018, 05:28 PM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Sams
It's sort of like the use of SR at the end of someone's name who has a son named Junior. It's an added attribute for the sake of clarity.

In this case, the inexactness makes it easier to understand.

Doug

.
Indeed--just as Pliny the Elder likely wasn't known as that until his nephew Pliny the Younger was born (or became prominent in his field of endeavor).
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-27-2018, 07:32 PM
jeffyjeep's Avatar
jeffyjeep jeffyjeep is offline
Old Submariner
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Home of Wayne & Garth
Posts: 7,771
Default

On the other hand, when it comes to the movies “Ghostbusters” and “Ghostbusters II”, the first “Ghostbusters” is never referred to as “Ghostbusters I”—but rather just “Ghostbusters” OR “the Ghostbusters movie that didn’t suck”.
__________________
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.

4 out of 3 people struggle with math.

Chemically, alcohol IS a solution.

NAR# 94042
SAM# 0078
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-30-2018, 02:28 PM
SEL's Avatar
SEL SEL is offline
Officially Middle-Aged Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Fish Named Wallyum
Am I the only one who had no idea about this?

https://www.facebook.com/estesrocke...?type=3&theater



Way back in 1998, Yita Wu of HUVARS (I think) put together a Little Joe I kit. Not exactly up to scale, but not bad. Below is a pic from a CMASS launch. Flew really well on C6-3's. It ultimately fell victim to a A8-3 (I wasn't wearing my glasses).



S.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  LJ1.jpg
Views: 46
Size:  443.0 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  LJ-I_2.jpg
Views: 60
Size:  82.5 KB  
__________________
SAM #0031
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-30-2018, 03:02 PM
rocket.aero rocket.aero is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEL
Way back in 1998, Yita Wu of HUVARS (I think) put together a Little Joe I kit. Not exactly up to scale, but not bad.


The Yitah Wu LJ kit was the seed that began a 20+ year obsession with the Little Joe for me. If I ever meet the guy I plan on buying him many beers.

The scale qualities of that kit were actually pretty good, and the forthcoming Estes kit is very similar to that old gem.

James
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024