Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > RockSim Asylum
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2009, 11:04 PM
Tau Zero's Avatar
Tau Zero Tau Zero is offline
Incurable SEMROC Fan
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho, USA
Posts: 2,318
Talking RockSim Tips & Tricks

Elsewhere on YORF, Don "Barone" Fent and that Craig McGraw boy observed:
Quote:
Originally Posted by barone
Maybe we need a "RockSim" section here in the forum under "Workbench" where people who have a RockSim specific question can ask it and those really knowledgable about the subject can inform us. I know there's bits and pieces posted all over this forum but maybe a dedicated section would be helpful? [SNIP] it would be really nice to find all the info in one spot instead of surfing the forum trying to find it.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPMcGraw
Maybe we should create a new thread...?
So here we go.

In the interest of keeping the content of this particular thread on-topic , please limit your questions and answers to the following loose but specific parameters :

Q. "I have RockSim [specify version here]. How do you make ring and tube fins sim accurately?"

A. "That will require borrowing a technique pioneered by Bruce S. 'teflonrocketry1' Levison, who is a qualified RockSim guru. Here's how Bruce does it..."


Each of us who have been bashing around with RockSim for a version or three have either managed to come up with our own little tricks, or learned and borrowed from other people (or each other). And migrating between versions can require some adjustments, too. ("What the hey? I *used* to be able to do that with the old version of RockSim? What gives with *this?*"


So here we go. (Parent's voice) "I don't think I need to remind you boys and girls to play nice."


Cheers,
__________________
Jay Goemmer
"Centuri Guy"/"Tau Zero"
YORF Member 28
Semroc SAM #0029
NAR 86131


"I think about organizing things all the time. Never seems to happen. I find something that piques my interest and I'm off on a quest. Or a Centuri. "

--Bill Eichelberger, 02/22/2022


“Centuri fret buzz in an updated form.”
Bill “Wallyum” Eichelberger re: Estes Flutter-By
03 Sept 2014
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-18-2009, 12:21 AM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Default How To: Compound Components

A compound component is where you merge the properties of two simple database components together to create a third component, which you cannot save to the database. The attached files show an example of this. I have created a transition to use with Estes BT-50 and BT-60 tubes, and which has a 1" wide base on the BT-60 end. The shoulder for the transition is still available as it would be with any other.

The idea is relatively uncomplicated. Start with your transition. Go into the edit dialog for the transition, and click the "Shoulder" tab. Locate the "Length" for the end you are adding the extension to, and increase the value found here by the length of the extension. Change the name of the component to some descriptive identifyer, and add "Front" in parentheses. Make sure the Material is "Balsa" (or whichever material you want it to be). Close this dialog. The shoulder is now very long on the 2D and 3D display screens.

Now, add a 1" length of standard tubing (in this case, BT-60) to that end of the transition. Open up the editor dialog for that piece of tube, and locate the "Material" drop-down box. Change the type of material, and the part name to match that of the original cone section, but add "Rear" in parentheses. Close the dialog.

You now have the equivalent of a single-piece component.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  TR-5060-2 Demo Pattern 3D.jpg
Views: 134
Size:  66.0 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  TR-5060-2 Demo Pattern 2D.jpg
Views: 141
Size:  81.6 KB  
Attached Files
File Type: rkt TR-5060-2 Demo Pattern.rkt (12.3 KB, 137 views)
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2009, 12:48 AM
James Pierson James Pierson is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 654
Thumbs up Think "BIG" Jay

Although a new thread about Rocksim is great however I personally would like to see a new Forum Title under the Workbench section. Something like "Rocksim Asylum" or something of that nature. Besides we could have many threads under such an area. We definely need to get all the DATA files in a neat thread along with the component parts, tips and tricks, etc... Just my two cents worth, JP.

We would be the first Forum to have an exclusive "Rocksim" thread to my knowledge.

James Pierson
NAR# 77907
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:09 AM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Pierson
Although a new thread about Rocksim is great however I personally would like to see a new Forum Title under the Workbench section. Something like "Rocksim Asylum" or something of that nature. Besides we could have many threads under such an area. We definely need to get all the DATA files in a neat thread along with the component parts, tips and tricks, etc... Just my two cents worth, JP.

We would be the first Forum to have an exclusive "Rocksim" thread to my knowledge.

James Pierson
NAR# 77907


Some have also mentioned "SpaceCad", so maybe a "Software" section with "RockSim" and "SpaceCad" as primary sub-threads. I know Scott could add them, but the question is do we need a "top-level domain" type of category (like Workbench, or Swap Shop) for this? I'm 50-50 with the idea. Most of us use RockSim, but I've never seen anything drawn up with SpaceCad. Does anyone here actually have it installed, and use it?

Might be something to have some discussions about, before setting it up.
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:17 AM
Mark II's Avatar
Mark II Mark II is offline
Forest Sprite
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Back Up in the Woods
Posts: 3,657
Default

Hey, Jay! What do you say?

OK, here's my first dilemma. I whipped up a RockSim 8 clone of the Centuri Groove Tube #KA-11. Everything is done per the plans found at JimZ's site, and it is built with parts from Semroc. The result matches up pretty well with the rocket's vital statistics shown in the 1972 Centuri catalog at Ninfinger.

The recommended engines are A8-3, B4-4 and C6-5.

Here are my results:

Length: 18.35"
Diameter: 0.908" (ST-8)
Fin Span: 2.724"
Weight: 1.5 oz

All simulations use a 48" x 1/8" rod.

A8-3........79.6'......Dv 42.6 FPS
B4-4........99.2'......Dv 70.6 FPS
C6-5........105.6'.....Dv n/a

The rocket is unstable using all recommended engines.

What am I missing?


Mark \\.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Centuri Groove Tube clone-3D.jpg
Views: 134
Size:  14.6 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Centuri Groove Tube clone.jpg
Views: 130
Size:  33.3 KB  
Attached Files
File Type: rkt Centuri Groove Tube clone.rkt (48.0 KB, 123 views)
__________________
Mark S. Kulka NAR #86134 L1,_ASTRE #471_Adirondack Mountains, NY
Opinions Unfettered by Logic • Advice Unsullied by Erudition • Rocketry Without Pity
+09281962-TAK-08272007+
SAM # 0011
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:17 AM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Pierson
Although a new thread about Rocksim is great however I personally would like to see a new Forum Title under the Workbench section. Something like "Rocksim Asylum" or something of that nature. Besides we could have many threads under such an area. We definely need to get all the DATA files in a neat thread along with the component parts, tips and tricks, etc... Just my two cents worth, JP.

We would be the first Forum to have an exclusive "Rocksim" thread to my knowledge.

James Pierson
NAR# 77907


Getting back to your idea, James...

Having a thread under the "Workbench" category... RockSim technical discussions do tend to get buried in other threads, don't they? Maybe we do need a way to bring them out into the sunshine. What do you think about having a whole category (like Workbench and Swap Shop) dedicated to RockSim, or "Software", with RockSim as a sub-category?

Sorry for this habit of thinking out loud...
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:36 AM
CPMcGraw's Avatar
CPMcGraw CPMcGraw is offline
BARCLONE Rocketry
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 5,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark II
OK, here's my first dilemma. I whipped up a RockSim 8 clone of the Centuri Groove Tube #KA-11. Everything is done per the plans found at JimZ's site, and it is built with parts from Semroc. The result matches up pretty well with the rocket's vital statistics shown in the 1972 Centuri catalog at Ninfinger.

The recommended engines are A8-3, B4-4 and C6-5.

Here are my results:

Length: 18.35"
Diameter: 0.908" (ST-8)
Fin Span: 2.724"
Weight: 1.5 oz

All simulations use a 48" x 1/8" rod.

[/font]
A8-3........79.6'......Dv 42.6 FPS
B4-4........99.2'......Dv 70.6 FPS
C6-5........105.6'.....Dv n/a
[/b]


I just fed the data into my copy, and got the same results, so it's RockSim not liking something. Let me look at one of my tube-fins and see what I did differently. I'll post later...

It's 1:37 in the morning, and my brain is whining...
__________________
Craig McGraw

BARCLONE Rocketry -- http://barclone.rocketshoppe.com
BARCLONE Blogsite -- http://barclone.wordpress.com
BARCLONE Forum -- BARCLONE Forum

BARs helping BARs

SAM 0044
AMA 352635
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:40 AM
Tau Zero's Avatar
Tau Zero Tau Zero is offline
Incurable SEMROC Fan
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho, USA
Posts: 2,318
Thumbs up Centuri Groove Tube -- RockSim 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark II
Hey, Jay! What do you say?

OK, here's my first dilemma. I whipped up a RockSim 8 clone of the Centuri Groove Tube #KA-11. Everything is done per the plans found at JimZ's site, and it is built with parts from Semroc. The result matches up pretty well with the rocket's vital statistics shown in the 1972 Centuri catalog at Ninfinger.

The recommended engines are A8-3, B4-4 and C6-5. [SNIP]

The rocket is unstable using all recommended engines.

What am I missing?
Here's how the aforementioned Bruce S. Levison did it in RockSim 7 (see attached file originally downloaded from The Rocketry Forum [TRF]). He did it to contrast how inaccurate RockSim 8 was with its tube fin calculations.

Of course, now that I look at it, I realize *I* may have been misinterpreting the way Bruce models tube fins. On the other hand, I think I have *ring* fins down okay, since Bruce was kind enough to look over an early version of my Tau Zero design and tweak it so it actually worked.


Cheers,
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Centuri_Groove_Tube_RS7_BL_01.jpg
Views: 145
Size:  125.6 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  Centuri_Groove_Tube_RS7_BL_02.jpg
Views: 143
Size:  139.9 KB  
Attached Files
File Type: rkt Centuri_Groove_Tube_RS7_Bruce_Levison.rkt (76.7 KB, 138 views)
File Type: rkt Centuri_Groove_Tube_RS8_Bruce_Levison.rkt (47.1 KB, 127 views)
__________________
Jay Goemmer
"Centuri Guy"/"Tau Zero"
YORF Member 28
Semroc SAM #0029
NAR 86131


"I think about organizing things all the time. Never seems to happen. I find something that piques my interest and I'm off on a quest. Or a Centuri. "

--Bill Eichelberger, 02/22/2022


“Centuri fret buzz in an updated form.”
Bill “Wallyum” Eichelberger re: Estes Flutter-By
03 Sept 2014

Last edited by CenturiGuy : 01-18-2009 at 02:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:55 AM
Tau Zero's Avatar
Tau Zero Tau Zero is offline
Incurable SEMROC Fan
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho, USA
Posts: 2,318
Wink A Modest Proposal...

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Pierson
"Think BIG Jay"
Jim, that *really* hurts my head.


Quote:
Originally Posted by James Pierson
Although a new thread about Rocksim is great however I personally would like to see a new Forum Title under the Workbench section. Something like "Rocksim Asylum" or something of that nature. Besides we could have many threads under such an area. We definely need to get all the DATA files in a neat thread along with the component parts, tips and tricks, etc...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPMcGraw
Having a thread under the "Workbench" category... RockSim technical discussions do tend to get buried in other threads, don't they? Maybe we do need a way to bring them out into the sunshine. What do you think about having a whole category (like Workbench and Swap Shop) dedicated to RockSim, or "Software", with RockSim as a sub-category?
Gentlemen,

I humbly recommend that we blend your suggestions thusly:

Workbench / Software / RockSim Asylum (with multiple threads)


"Gather ye inmates, while ye may..."


LTV Scott , is this doable? And do we need any further discussion on the matter?



Submitted for your consideration,
__________________
Jay Goemmer
"Centuri Guy"/"Tau Zero"
YORF Member 28
Semroc SAM #0029
NAR 86131


"I think about organizing things all the time. Never seems to happen. I find something that piques my interest and I'm off on a quest. Or a Centuri. "

--Bill Eichelberger, 02/22/2022


“Centuri fret buzz in an updated form.”
Bill “Wallyum” Eichelberger re: Estes Flutter-By
03 Sept 2014
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-18-2009, 02:23 AM
Mark II's Avatar
Mark II Mark II is offline
Forest Sprite
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Back Up in the Woods
Posts: 3,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CenturiGuy
Here's how the aforementioned Bruce S. Levison did it in RockSim 7 (see attached file originally downloaded from The Rocketry Forum [TRF]). He did it to contrast how inaccurate RockSim 8 was with its tube fin calculations.

Of course, now that I look at it, I realize *I* may have been misinterpreting the way Bruce models tube fins. On the other hand, I think I have *ring* fins down okay, since Bruce was kind enough to look over an early version of my Tau Zero design and tweak it so it actually worked.


Cheers,

OK, Bruce Levison's RS8 version looks almost identical to mine, yet his version works (at least for BP A's and B's) and mine doesn't. I don't see what the critical difference is. Can anyone point out what I am missing?

I encountered this same problem when I tried to simulate a Quest Totally Tubular. That's what caused me to think that there was something very odd about the way that RS does tube fins.

BTW, what are those extra fin-like structures in the tubes in the RS 7 version of Bruce's file? What the heck is that all about? And what is that blue star-like structure at the base of the main BT in your file?

Finally, you mention ring fins. Does RS do something weird with them, too? (See next post.)

I like RockSim's concept, its execution and its polish. I want to keep this on topic and find answers about these particular things, in order to gain some insight and learn a trick or two or a tip that I can use in the future.

If Scott creates a new subsection under the Workbench as James and Jay propose, then I'd be happy to confine the discussion of this one issue to one particular thread within it. That would work well, I think.

I think that the proposed subsection should be confined to talking about specific techniques, solving specific problems and answering specific questions. IOW, "hands-on" stuff. (Conceptual ranting about the program itself or anything else, which I am as prone to doing as anyone else, could still be done in other places, just not there. )

Mark \\.
__________________
Mark S. Kulka NAR #86134 L1,_ASTRE #471_Adirondack Mountains, NY
Opinions Unfettered by Logic • Advice Unsullied by Erudition • Rocketry Without Pity
+09281962-TAK-08272007+
SAM # 0011

Last edited by Mark II : 01-18-2009 at 04:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024