#31
|
||||
|
||||
I wasn't goint to take the pads off.
I just wasn't going to put them on for the first flight. I wanted to fly it without the pads just to see if it made any difference. I can always glue them on later.
__________________
"I'm a sandman. I've never killed anyone. I terminate runners when their time is up." Logan from "Logan's Run" http://sandmandecals.com/ |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
The landing pads would cause stability if the airstream hits them at the same angle....but it never does because the pads are tilted.
Since the angle of the pads changes as the angle of attack changes, the problem is magnified. When the rocket tilts, the pads that need to have the most drag, will be angled more vertically and have less drag. The pads that need to have the least drag, will be tilted more horizontally, causing more drag and making the Lander tilt even more. To add self correcting stability for vertical flight, the pads would need to be tilted opposite the way they are on the model. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
John Lance Ladd Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems Grovers Mill, NJ Established 1938 lladd.netau.net |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
An interesting idea, but I don't think so. The pads are very sturdy, it would take alot to get one out of alignment. I think any wack that could move a pad would break the leg.
Only the very bottom of each pad touches the ground. I think Carl found the problem with the leg wooble. Mark |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I still believe my Estes ML went unstable for a reason that's a mystery (to me) to this day. The "simple" adding of a little nose weight (with an additional screweye) solved the problem. Since it was built "like a tank," I can't think what components within the model could have shifted after all those successful flights to change the CG/CP relationship. Here's a pic of that ML in my display case (pic taken last year; the ML itself is 35 years old): http://www.nasarocketclub.com/galle...17/FH000024_001 I have a roll of masking tape underneath the ML to help support the landing legs while on display...
__________________
Dave, NAR # 21853 SR. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not talking about getting out of alignment. I'm talking about the angle of the pads causing a varied amount of drag and vectoring.
The first picture shows the pads on my Alien Explorer, which are angled similarly to the Mars Lander. When the rocket tips off to the left, for whatever reason, the pad on the left becomes fully horizontal and much more draggy than the other, which is now tilted at roughly 45 degrees. The 45 degree angle pad acts like a canted fin. Both pads work together to tilt the rocket even more. If the pads were tilted the opposite direction, the effect after tipoff would be the opposite. The left pad is almost vertical, giving the least amount of drag, and it's also not canted as far, so it doesn't want to change the rocket's direction as much. The right pad is almost horizontal, creating extra drag on that side, so the rocket wants to tilt back to the vertical. Of course, the ML has smaller pads, but it's also a much shorter rocket and outside forces will do more to it. Last edited by tbzep : 07-03-2006 at 09:34 PM. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Oh, I understand now.
I suppose, It would have a small effect but the lander is marginally stable anyway. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The less stable the rocket is, the more effect these forces would have. Aircraft and watercraft have used this technique to create straight line stability by using wedge shaped airfoils or turning double finlets like the last picture, not like the first, so it definately can have more than a marginal effect. Build two clone Alien Explorers, one with pads and one without. You will see a huge difference in vertical stability after multiple flights of each. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
John Lance Ladd Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems Grovers Mill, NJ Established 1938 lladd.netau.net |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|