Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > Mission Control
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2013, 03:38 PM
A Fish Named Wallyum A Fish Named Wallyum is online now
BP Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ft. Thomas, KY
Posts: 8,614
Default My inner geek SCREAMS!!!



FLY ME!!!!! TONIGHT !!!!!!!!!

This showed up on the porch today. I've never been a Star Trek fan, but everything about this set is just incredibly cool. The launcher itself is what initially caused me to make the bid on this, and it was worth the price of entry all on its own. (But being able to party like it's 1977 with the rocket is also pretty sharp. ) B6-4 Field is in use at the moment, but I'm off tonight, and if we don't get hosed by Ma Nature tonight, I might just sneak off for a morning launch tomorrow.
__________________
Bill Eichelberger
NAR 79563

http://wallyum.blogspot.com/

I miss being SAM 0058

Build floor: Centuri Design Contest F-150 Hurricane Estes - Low Boom SST Semroc - Marauder, Shrike, SST Shuttle

In paint: Canaroc Starfighter Scorpion Estes F-22 Air Superiority Fighter, Multi-Roc, Solar Sailer II Semroc Cyber III

Ready to fly: Estes - Solar Sailer II Semroc - Earmark, Groonie Der V 1/2
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2013, 04:50 PM
hcmbanjo's Avatar
hcmbanjo hcmbanjo is offline
When Pigs Fly!
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,102
Default

I agree, I always thought that battery based launcher was a smart idea.
That blast deflector seems a little small tho.
__________________
Hans "Chris" Michielssen
Old/New NAR # 19086 SR

www.oddlrockets.com
www.modelrocketbuilding.blogspot.com
http://www.nar.org/educational-reso...ing-techniques/
Your results may vary
"Nose cones roll, be careful with that."
Every spaceman needs a ray gun.
Look out - I'm the Meister Shyster!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2013, 06:05 PM
jeffyjeep's Avatar
jeffyjeep jeffyjeep is offline
Old Submariner
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Home of Wayne & Garth
Posts: 7,765
Default

It looks like you'll be taking on quite an enterprise.
__________________
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.

4 out of 3 people struggle with math.

Chemically, alcohol IS a solution.

NAR# 94042
SAM# 0078
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2013, 06:08 PM
A Fish Named Wallyum A Fish Named Wallyum is online now
BP Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ft. Thomas, KY
Posts: 8,614
Default

__________________
Bill Eichelberger
NAR 79563

http://wallyum.blogspot.com/

I miss being SAM 0058

Build floor: Centuri Design Contest F-150 Hurricane Estes - Low Boom SST Semroc - Marauder, Shrike, SST Shuttle

In paint: Canaroc Starfighter Scorpion Estes F-22 Air Superiority Fighter, Multi-Roc, Solar Sailer II Semroc Cyber III

Ready to fly: Estes - Solar Sailer II Semroc - Earmark, Groonie Der V 1/2
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2013, 06:17 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,924
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffyjeep
It looks like you'll be taking on quite an enterprise.


A very 'logical' conclusion....


Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2013, 06:24 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,924
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hcmbanjo
I agree, I always thought that battery based launcher was a smart idea.
That blast deflector seems a little small tho.


The deflector is a bit small for routine use. I had this same launcher (in black) that came with the Battlestar Galactic set in the late 70s. Having started out with the Centuri Power Pad a couple years before that, this pad worked out well with my existing lantern batteries I used at the time. But that small round deflector was not quite as 'protective' as the Centuri angled deflector that came with my Sceaming Eagle starter set.

In all though, I thought those lantern top launchers by Centuri and Estes fairly clever and very functional (and portable... via ten-speed bike back in the day).


Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2013, 06:34 PM
RWmarlow RWmarlow is offline
Gentleman Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 198
Default

Is the Fin Can a little more robust than the current "generic" BT 50 can?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-27-2013, 07:35 PM
K'Tesh's Avatar
K'Tesh K'Tesh is offline
Seagulls Beware...
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Subject to Change
Posts: 930
Angry You have offended the Klingon Empire...

You have offended the Klingon Empire...

How? Because you got the winning bid, instead of me...

Use it well Terran...
__________________
.
.

Dreaming of making the rockets I dreamed of as a kid (and then some).

"The Guide says there is an art to flying", said Ford, "or rather a knack."
"The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."


Launching is Optional... Landing? That Depends on Trees.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-27-2013, 07:37 PM
A Fish Named Wallyum A Fish Named Wallyum is online now
BP Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ft. Thomas, KY
Posts: 8,614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWmarlow
Is the Fin Can a little more robust than the current "generic" BT 50 can?

That was kind of a shocker. To me it seems nowhere close. One of the fins is slightly damaged, but not enough to keep it from flying. Looks like some kind of chemical or glue attacked it. All in all, the fins seem a good 25% thinner than the current fin can.
__________________
Bill Eichelberger
NAR 79563

http://wallyum.blogspot.com/

I miss being SAM 0058

Build floor: Centuri Design Contest F-150 Hurricane Estes - Low Boom SST Semroc - Marauder, Shrike, SST Shuttle

In paint: Canaroc Starfighter Scorpion Estes F-22 Air Superiority Fighter, Multi-Roc, Solar Sailer II Semroc Cyber III

Ready to fly: Estes - Solar Sailer II Semroc - Earmark, Groonie Der V 1/2
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-27-2013, 08:34 PM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWmarlow
Is the Fin Can a little more robust than the current "generic" BT 50 can?

The old Star Trek/Challenger 1 fin can was from a different mold. It had retangular fins where the Generic E2X has a slightly swept leading edge. The old can had a slight diamond shaped airfoil, where the modern one is wedge shaped. The thick trailing edge of the wedge makes the modern can quite a bit stiffer.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024