|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
SAD NEWS - First model rocket flight fatality announced by NAR President
NAR President Ted Cochran posted this on the NAR Facebook page a short time ago:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2255560886/?fref=nf Quote:
__________________
Contest flying, Sport flying, it's all good..... NAR# 18723 NAR.org GeorgesRockets.com Georges'CancerGoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-geo...ay-fight-cancer |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Very Sad News indeed.
A GoFundMe account has been set up: https://www.gofundme.com/mikebentley Prayers for Michael Bentley, his Family, Friends, and the Scouts involved. Rest In Peace Michael. God Bless!
__________________
. . Dreaming of making the rockets I dreamed of as a kid (and then some). "The Guide says there is an art to flying", said Ford, "or rather a knack." "The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Launching is Optional... Landing? That Depends on Trees. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I put some local links to the NAR Facebook page.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I know this is a very sad event
and I certainly do not wish to minimize any aspect of this tragedy, but I would very much like to hear exactly what "model rocket" caused this injury. I strongly suspect that this was at least a mid-power model, if not a high-power rocket. Also kinda sounds like there may have been a failure to eject/deploy, and that the rocket came back down still in ballistic flight.
Somebody needs to do some follow-up reporting on this. I feel sad for this guy and his family, he was out there working to help scouts on his own time, and something terrible like this happens. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I suspect the NAR is already doing an all-out investigation and thinking about next steps.
At the least, there might be new safety recommendations. Which might amount to: Heads Up means Heads Up. Range Closed means Ranged Closed. Pre-flight recovery system check and engine retention check, with a list of specific things to check. Maybe an educational video of a RSO inspecting a half-dozen rockets.
__________________
NAR #27085 - Oregon Rocketry - SAM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Very tragic.
__________________
Friends Don't let Friends Do TRF |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://www.rocketryforum.com/showth...539#post1518539
__________________
-Fred Shecter NAR 20117 (L2) Southern California Rocket Association, NAR Section 430 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If however the rocket contained a motor over 160 n-s (the MR limit in CA), it would be CA EHPR anyway. We don't know. This is why NAR (or an ad hoc committee of manufacturers and club leaders) should lobby to eliminate special CA laws and rules in this 49 state country. The recent bill spearheaded by Shecter solved a problem for TARC (10+ years after the fact) but not for rocketeers generally beyond "model rocketry". CA still requires special stamps, special fees, special manufacturer permits, no other state requires. His success passing a bill should be translated to the above policy proposal of mine, "eliminate special CA laws and rules". Jerry List of highly unlikely events: The first fatality in NAR history A no-ejection rocket in a head's up situation Head's up contributed to the severity of the injury The rocket hit a person The rocket also hit a vulnerable portion of the person (astronomically unlikely, 1 in Billions) A state law had been passed for the first time in decades It was not in effect yet, but conformed to current national practice, regulations and insurance standards. Several first responders on site could not save the victim An absolute pillar of the community was lost cite: U.S. Rockets CSFM approval: http://v-serv.com/usr/images/CSFM3.jpg http://v-serv.com/usr/images/CSFM2.jpg Hard evidence: http://www.rocketryforum.com/showth...667#post1518667 My response: This was less likely than being hit by lightning twice in one week. There was nothing you could do to avoid it. It is bad for all involved and also all not. I suspect this man will receive continued support and recognition. Let those students move on, but keep doing rocket launches in honor of your accomplished leader. Last edited by Jerry Irvine : 11-17-2015 at 07:46 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
They locked up the thread over at the terribly run forum, I was surprised it lasted as long as it did. Some facts were starting to emerge that scared the H-E-double tooth picks out of the top men, can you spell future civil litigation? So Sheeple, please, no speculation or discussion on this issue, it is uncouth. Think only of the Family. Mourning, donations and prayer are of course couth. They will tells us when it is OK, but in the mean time just shut up your mouth! I for one will wait for the Blue Ribbon panel to tell me every thing is OK and finally reveal any disturbing or embarrassing facts only as needed. CNN style speculation by so called experts on forums is just too nasty, especially given the press coverage so far and that too much information has got out. So go about your business as usual, stay calm, they will take care of you, these are not the droids you are looking for.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I seldom visit TRF but from the last post there and from an eye witness it doesn't sound like it was a NAR event or club. Did I miss something?
I get the impression safety was lax to say the least with several mentions of standing next to the pad, possibly holding the rocket just before or at ignition and it came right back to the pad, means the poor guy had to be standing next to it at ignition in order to get hit. WTH??? How many code violations happened there??? Who among us would push the button with ANYONE next to the pads? I hope that was an accident or equipment failure. I have never understood why people want to stand next to the pads at lift off and yes, there are those who do. The actual facts should be very educational, if we ever get ALL the facts. Randy www.vernarockets.com http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HHJHOK6 http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00O14ET8K https://www.facebook.com/RocketBabeDustStorm |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|