Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Scale & Sport Scale Rocketry
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-28-2012, 02:23 PM
AcroRay's Avatar
AcroRay AcroRay is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South-Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 265
Default Help: Rocket always arcs into the wind

I've got a very basic question to ask. Apologies if this is something I should know already, but I spend more time on the skills and technique of building a pretty rocket and prepping it for flight than I do with the mechanics of the flight itself...

For very nearly every flight, my Quest Striker AGM will weather**** into the wind, no matter how minimal the breeze. If I'm fortunate enough to get a relative windless moment at launch, the bird will fly straight up very high. But add a little wind, and it will lose expend potential flight path altitude on a shallow arc into the wind.

I fly it on Estes C6's. It has no nose weight, as per the instructions. It seems to balance out OK. For the recovery system I've got the kit's 'chute on a snap-swivel with Quest's kevlar plus two extra body lengths of cotton/elastic cord and a 3x3 Nomex panel (haven't had to use any wadding with it).

What should I do and how should I trouble-shoot to get this bird to fly higher and straighter?

http://www.rocketreviews.com/ray-ac...triker-agm.html
__________________
BAR after a 29 year absence. Using my plastic, resin & vinyl kit building skills (and my paycheck)
to build what I could only dream of as an 11 year old...


My Rocketreviews.com Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-28-2012, 03:01 PM
FastCargo FastCargo is offline
Junior Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17
Default

Well, there are several things that will determine how quickly your rocket reacts to the wind.

1) CG to CP relationship. In general, the closer the CP is to the CG, the more resistant the rocket is to a sideways force (ie crosswind). But, the problem is that it also means it takes a long time for it to correct back to course when it encounters a deviation.

This seems counter to what you would think. If CP is close to CG, shouldn't that mean that the rocket is less stable? It does...but that's because the corrective force is small when it encounters a deviation. But it also means the deviation force has a smaller effect because the moment arm is small (assuming the wind hits all the rocket at the same velocity).

BUT, and this is important, this means the rocket is VERY sensitive at slow speeds to weather****ing. However, at faster speeds, you'll find it's more gust resistant than a bird with a large CG to CP relationship.

2) Speed off the rod. The faster the rocket is at the end of the launch rod, the more resistant it will be to changing direction once it leaves the rod (technically, the faster the rocket, the closer the relative wind is to the initial flight path direction).

3) Mass distribution. If the rocket is like a barbell, with most of the weight even across the airframe to concentrated at the tips, you'll find it's more resistant to deviation. Imagine trying to spin a barbell at the CG verses spinning a bar of the same size, weight and CG location...you'll find the barbell is harder to get started, and harder to stop.

If I had to take a guess, based on what i'm seeing (I don't know the details on the Stryker), the fins appear to be very large relative to the airframe...meaning the CP is pretty far from the CG...ie it corrects quickly into the relative wind.

This is what I think anyway. Hopefully folks smarter than me will be able to shed some more light on the subject.

FC
__________________
My son has cancer. Tell me again why your 'issue' matters?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-28-2012, 03:22 PM
AcroRay's Avatar
AcroRay AcroRay is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South-Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 265
Default

Thanks for all that! This is the only bird I've got that has this severe weatherc0cking problem. (Apart from the Quest X30). I really want to see if there's some way I can get it to straighten up and fly right. It's one of my favorites.

Attached are a couple of pictures. It uses the old MPC Nike Smoke PNC and plastic boat-tail. You can see it going into the wind not far off of the launch rod.

it did come out a bit heavier than what was listed on the package specs.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Striker AGM.jpg
Views: 80
Size:  59.1 KB  Click image for larger version

Name:  IntoTheWind.jpg
Views: 79
Size:  45.9 KB  
__________________
BAR after a 29 year absence. Using my plastic, resin & vinyl kit building skills (and my paycheck)
to build what I could only dream of as an 11 year old...


My Rocketreviews.com Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-28-2012, 03:35 PM
Davidtmp Davidtmp is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 111
Default

How many launch lugs does this thing have?? I looked at the picture, and I see one long one. It looks to be half way up the rocket. Is this where yours is?
This could be a potential problem. If you need a 36" rod to get the required speed to hold it's course, but you have only 20" with the lug being where it is and the rocket is loaded up on a pin to keep it away from the fire in aft end, then you may not be getting enough speed to counter the wind at the end of the rod.
The fins don't look to be that big, say like a Big Bertha's. Possibly if the launch lugs were even split, one at the lower end of the rocket, and the other around where the one is in the picture, it may help.
This is the only thing that stuck out to me looking at the picture, other than what FC had said. It may not be a problem either, just something to consider.
__________________
David Tomkinson
Member of ROCC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-28-2012, 04:00 PM
AcroRay's Avatar
AcroRay AcroRay is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South-Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 265
Default

It's got one rather lengthy lug mounted around center length of the BT, on a standoff. The fins are a bit larger than Big Bertha's, I believe. Although I'd have to compare to my unbuilt Bertha to be certain...

It is likely its not getting enough distance on the rod prior to leaving it, though. That sounds very likely.
__________________
BAR after a 29 year absence. Using my plastic, resin & vinyl kit building skills (and my paycheck)
to build what I could only dream of as an 11 year old...


My Rocketreviews.com Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-28-2012, 08:40 PM
scsager's Avatar
scsager scsager is offline
Mid Power Wannabe
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 59
Default

Ray - does your rocket really weigh 11 oz as Quest advertises? If you are only seeing 400 ft in dead calm air, I suspect you need more than C6 power.

Try an Aerotech D10 or D21. It may be the "fix" you need.
__________________
- Scott, NAR 91621
Woosh #558
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-28-2012, 09:31 PM
FastCargo FastCargo is offline
Junior Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scsager
Ray - does your rocket really weigh 11 oz as Quest advertises? If you are only seeing 400 ft in dead calm air, I suspect you need more than C6 power.

Try an Aerotech D10 or D21. It may be the "fix" you need.


Yeeesh...11 ounces on a C6? If it weighs at least that much, I'll bet it's slooow coming off the rod. I suspect that's your issue right there...

FC
__________________
My son has cancer. Tell me again why your 'issue' matters?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-28-2012, 09:58 PM
LW Bercini's Avatar
LW Bercini LW Bercini is offline
BAR Redux
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Macon GA
Posts: 107
Default

I know it's CHAD, but a spin tab solves all kinds of arcing and weatherc0cking issues
__________________
__________________
Lawrence William
SAM #0422
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-28-2012, 10:05 PM
Jerry Irvine's Avatar
Jerry Irvine Jerry Irvine is offline
Freeform rocketry advocate.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Claremont, CA "The intellectual capitol of the world."-WSJ
Posts: 3,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcroRay
It's got one rather lengthy lug mounted around center length of the BT, on a standoff.
That is likely the main cause of the problem. Firstly I suggest lugs be mounted at the rear of the rocket and one at the CG (2 lugs) which optimizes rod usage. The fact you have an effective fin on the side, near the middle and perhaps even forward of the CG is if nothing else a contributing factor.

People mis-interpret wind. Wind may be low near the ground but wind speeds vary with altitude, sometime a lot. It is a boundry layer approximating zero speed on the ground and "high" speed about 100 feet. Whatever high is.

I see the rocket design has a relative high L/D, relatively large and four fins, the secondary fins are relatively small and relatively rearward located for such things.

I wonder if your parachute is dislocating during boost. I also wonder if you are getting rod whip which can look like weather***. Also a single central lug, standoff or not, can result in rod binding and thus promote rod whip more than almost anything.

I would also make the standoff just as short as possible and with the dual lug comment as short as possible because they are fins.







http://www.rocketryforum.com/attach...83&d=1283205123

Just Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-29-2012, 08:52 AM
AcroRay's Avatar
AcroRay AcroRay is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South-Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 265
Default

Thanks, Jerry, and the rest of you guys for input!

The Tripoli Pittsburgh launch site does tend to have crosswinds at higher altitudes. Usually a bit higher than this bird manages to make, though.

I still have to double-check the weight, but it is rather heavy.

The launch lug has been an issue. I got a rod hang-up that resulted in a bad crash & broken fins on the thing's second flight. Part of it was due to corrosion on the rod. But at other club members' advice, I cut down the launch lug's length. It is still pretty big, though, so I do like Jerry's & David's suggestions of two smaller lugs and smaller standoffs. The challenge with making the standoffs shorter, though, is that the nose cone really sticks out far from the body.

But I do believe I'll put it on the bench this summer and try those suggested modifications!

Next, though, I'll get more accurate weights, CP and CG measurements. C6's are the biggest engines in my inventory. (Budget usually keeps my household at Blast Off Packs for our seasonal engine compliment.) The Aerotech D10 /D21 might be part of the solution, but I think that'll significantly increase my cost-per-launch a bit higher than I like. Humn...
__________________
BAR after a 29 year absence. Using my plastic, resin & vinyl kit building skills (and my paycheck)
to build what I could only dream of as an 11 year old...


My Rocketreviews.com Gallery
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024