Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Ye Olde Rocket Forum (http://www.oldrocketforum.com/index.php)
-   Software (http://www.oldrocketforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=28)
-   -   Anyone use the Openrocket base drag trick? (http://www.oldrocketforum.com/showthread.php?t=20085)

RobVG 11-24-2021 10:06 PM

Anyone use the Rocksim / Openrocket base drag trick?
 
In the Apogee newsletter #154 Bruce Levison shows how to use a zero mass cone at the back of the rocket to simulate base drag.

Openrocket understates the stability of short stubby rockets and this trick is supposed to compensate for it.

My problem is, he didn't clearly define just what qualifies as a short stubby rocket.

He said the trick is for rockets with "much less than the normal 10 to 1" length to diameter ratio.

He's pretty exact with how to draw the cone but not with what rockets you should apply it to.

Thanks

Tau Zero 11-26-2021 01:32 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobVG
In the Apogee newsletter #154 Bruce Levison shows how to use a zero mass cone at the back of the rocket to simulate base drag.

Openrocket understates the stability of short stubby rockets and this trick is supposed to compensate for it.

My problem is, he didn't clearly define just what qualifies as a short stubby rocket.

He said the trick is for rockets with "much less than the normal 10 to 1" length to diameter ratio.

He's pretty exact with how to draw the cone but not with what rockets you should apply it to.
RobVG,

I used this technique on a slightly upscaled Centuri Vector-V ("Good heavens!") 10 years ago:


https://forums.rocketshoppe.com/sho...127&postcount=1

HenryMac 11-28-2021 07:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobVG
In the Apogee newsletter #154 Bruce Levison shows how to use a zero mass cone at the back of the rocket to simulate base drag.

Openrocket understates the stability of short stubby rockets and this trick is supposed to compensate for it.

My problem is, he didn't clearly define just what qualifies as a short stubby rocket.

He said the trick is for rockets with "much less than the normal 10 to 1" length to diameter ratio.

He's pretty exact with how to draw the cone but not with what rockets you should apply it to.

Thanks


Agreed... WTH is "much less than the normal 10 to 1"? I guess since the Estes Fat Boy is 4.6:1 that less than 5:1 is the definition?

aeppel_cpm 11-29-2021 08:03 AM

That article is about an earlier version of Rocksim - but Openrocket is supposed to have the same issue: it calculates the amount of base drag ok, but doesn't position it correctly.

I've also used it to convince myself that certain squat rockets would be okay to fly.

From a discussion over on the Forum That Shall Not Be Named (I don't have a link handy) the general feel was that the hack could always be applied, no matter the length of the rocket - but that as the L:D goes up, it's a smaller and smaller fraction of the overall forces. By 10:1, it's negligible.

RobVG 12-02-2021 09:20 PM

Thanks for your thoughts!

Winston2021 12-17-2021 01:56 PM

I have an Estes Big Daddy Rocksim file that I got from somewhere and one that I long ago modified with the base drag virtual cone. Just ran some sims:

Loaded with D12-5 - 0.38 stability factor
With virtual cone & loaded with D12-5 - 1.02 stability factor

Considering how close the latter is to the rule of thumb 1.0, perhaps even Estes uses the virtual cone method to create a safe design without specifying a lot of unnecessary nose weight.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.