Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > FreeForAll
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2022, 08:16 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,935
Default Boeing OFT-2 in May

Looks like Boeing will try again with the Starliner test flight #2, currently slated for May 19.

NASA News Release link: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-test-2-mission

Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2022, 12:14 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,514
Default

Let's hope it's not BoeZOing this time...
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, TURMOIL, FIASCOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2022, 05:15 PM
mojo1986's Avatar
mojo1986 mojo1986 is offline
Old Canuck Modeller
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kingston, CANADA
Posts: 2,161
Default

Sooooo slowwww! No wonder Spacex is eating their lunch. Boeing has a LOT of problems.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2022, 01:40 AM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,514
Default

Fat-Cat traditional govt-linked aerospace contractors such as Boeing are woefully slow compared to SpaceX.
Private sector ran-like-a-proper-business companies like SpaceX will always beat big contractors in terms of speed, cost, and efficiency.
They just march to a far different drummer.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, TURMOIL, FIASCOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2022, 05:40 AM
Bill's Avatar
Bill Bill is offline
I do not like Facebook
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Tejas
Posts: 3,104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghrocketman
Private sector ran-like-a-proper-business companies like SpaceX will always beat big contractors in terms of speed, cost, and efficiency.


You mean you can have fast, cheap AND good after all?

With Elon Musk picking fights with the Biden Administration and now the Twitter adventure, will Starship be given a chance?


Bill
__________________
It is well past time to Drill, Baby, Drill!

If your June, July, August and September was like this, you might just hate summer too...

Please unload your question before you ask it unless you have a concealed harry permit.

: countdown begin cr dup . 1- ?dup 0= until cr ." Launch!" cr ;

Give a man a rocket and he will fly for a day; teach him to build and he will spend the rest of his days sanding...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2022, 12:17 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,514
Default

No you can't have all three of fast, cheap, and good.
Govt contractors only give you ONE of the 3. Usually good, but Slow and Expensive .
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, TURMOIL, FIASCOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-10-2022, 08:00 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,935
Default

Still on target for the early eve of May 19. News conference tomorrow to discuss the upcoming launch.

NASA news article link: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...wed-flight-test


Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-11-2022, 08:55 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,935
Default

Looks like Boeing and Aerojet-Rocketdyne are pointing fingers at each other over the stuck valve issue that caused the roll back to the pad of the vehicle last year. Don’t guess this is a story that would ever be even mentioned by NASA officially.

Story link: https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/11/tech...iner/index.html


Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2022, 11:52 AM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Earl
Looks like Boeing and Aerojet-Rocketdyne are pointing fingers at each other over the stuck valve issue that caused the roll back to the pad of the vehicle last year. Don’t guess this is a story that would ever be even mentioned by NASA officially.

Story link: https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/11/tech...iner/index.html


Earl

I guess it was also Aerojet's fault that the software got screwed up on the first flight.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-2022, 04:34 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl Earl is offline
Apollo Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbzep
I guess it was also Aerojet's fault that the software got screwed up on the first flight.


Well, there is that, isn’t there. I don’t think Boeing spoke about that issue in the article, which was (as I recall) the root issue for the orbit issue on the first test flight thus requiring this second test flight which, at this point, has yet to occur.

On the valve issue, it seems NASA appears to side with Boeing on the root cause of that issue, according to the article:

“A team of Boeing and NASA engineers is in general agreement that the cause of the stuck valves involves a chemical reaction between propellant, aluminum materials and the intrusion of moisture from Starliner’s humid Florida launch site. Aerojet engineers and lawyers see it differently, blaming a cleaning chemical that Boeing has used in ground tests, two of the sources said. An Aerojet representative declined to comment.”

===========


Bottom line, one would suspect Boeing is very embarrassed by all these delays and the mounting costs on THEIR ledger sheets. Hopefully for ALL concerned this next test flight will do the trick.

Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr.
NAR# 29523
TRA# 962
SAM# 73
Owner/Producer
Point 39 Productions

Rocket-Brained Since 1970
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024