Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Vendors
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-22-2011, 12:22 PM
jadebox's Avatar
jadebox jadebox is offline
Roger Smith/JonRocket.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 1,007
Default

We have a small selection of The Launch Pad kits. Because we have a limited number and aren't planning to stock them, we are periodically listing them as auction items on eBay.

Our auction of a "Type 30" kit is ending soon. Also, there's another vendor with a selection of "Buy It Now" Launch Pad kits.

http://www.rocketreviews.com/the-launch-pad-7375.html

-- Roger
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-22-2011, 04:05 PM
kevinj's Avatar
kevinj kevinj is offline
Not so Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghrocketman
D's in ANY flavor are NOT mid-power unless clustered. Estes E9's are not either as they have less kick than a D12.


Who said E9? I fly them on E15, E30, E28.

Also several of the kits come with clustered 24mm mounts. Guess with 2 D's in them they _are_ real mid powered rockets after all.

kj
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-22-2011, 04:35 PM
luke strawwalker's Avatar
luke strawwalker luke strawwalker is offline
BAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Needville and Shiner, TX
Posts: 6,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinj
I will offer a different opinion from GHR becasue I don't automatically assume that a mid power (E, F or G) model has to be built like an HPR tank to fly.

You can fly the TLP models on D's, E's, and SOME F motors built stock per the directions.

I've built and flown 4 different TLP kits (Exocet, Pershing, small Pheonix, and Hellfire) and they all have been excellent models flown on D and E power. If you expect to fly them on F and G's becasue that's what MPR means to you, then you will have to do some modifications.

And lets face it, for some missiles they are the only game in town.

kj


Yeah, I agree with you Kj... they are LOW END "MPR" kits-- not the upper end of the spectrum that basically is kissing cousins to HPR.

IF one wants a HPR kit, BUY a HPR kit... Madcow and several other vendors offer some neat kits of some of the same subjects that TLP does... I'll agree with GH on the mushy balsa and no decals bit... I can understand that decals are a PITA (just ask Wes at Dr. Zooch) but they should be marketed as "NO DECALS" and maybe some pointers or printouts of the decal markings, sizing, and locations, printed on plain paper, that could be scanned in and printed on decal paper by the modeler himself, would be a TERRIFIC addition to the kit! For the volume of kits that they've had to sell, and the fact that MANY of them use the same "pointed" BB-80 nosecone, it seems like they could have had a mold made and a special run of pointed BB-80's made without having to resort to the paper cone glued on top.

They are what they are-- a builder's kit, to be sure... and for the price a pretty fair bargain-- by no means a terrific bargain (though with the additions I mentioned they certainly would be, and wouldn't HAVE to break the bank to do it (decal location/markings printouts included on plain paper in the kit). I don't have a problem with the lighter materials (other than the spongy balsa) but then I'm not into 'overbuilding' stuff or overpowering it... though some are...

I like them pretty well... OL JR
__________________
The X-87B Cruise Basselope-- THE Ultimate Weapon in the arsenal of Homeland Security and only $52 million per round!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-22-2011, 04:44 PM
jharding58's Avatar
jharding58 jharding58 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 1,936
Default

Got to agree with Uncle Mike. The TLP kits were pretty unique in certain aspects. I built the Standard and went through God knows how many dress maker's pins to reproduce the rivets. I also built the SAM from plans - which was pretty interesting build with the cluster and pneumatic staging!

There was a rush when they were "back" but that seemed to diminsh once again. Their website home page has not been touched since 2008 and the product page since 2005. Even the "News" has not been updated since December 2009.

Sad really.
__________________
Gravity is a harsh mistress
SAM 002
NAR 91005
"The complexity of living is eminently favored to the simplicity of not."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-25-2011, 07:33 PM
gdjsky01 gdjsky01 is offline
Religion Free thank you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 95
Default

Well I guess this is a passionate topic.... but before you get too upset, I am just conversing here ok? No yelling.

I 've only built 3 of them. I built them stock and they fly fine on the recommended BP and AP motors as well as some non-recommended AP motors (if you are careful with the CG). I gotta tell ya, I have FAR FAR FAR more pride in my TLP builds than any MPR or HPR 3/4FNC I have ever built. And as I said, I built them pretty much box stock. I've got 6 in the queue. I like em that much.

Semroc SLS? Excellent stuff from what I hear! But from what I have seen of it (IIRC) the really interesting rockets go for 2 to 3 times TLP price. So I mean why is it a surprise that they come more complete and with heavier (more expensive) materials? They COST more. (My order from Sirius Rocketry - great service by the way - was 3 TLP for $100). You will get roughly 1.5 to 2 interesting SLS rockets for that.

The reason Uncle Mike, who I keep shoveling money at BTW ( ) sold them out is some of us love a builders kit. There are subjects in the TLP line that no-one has tackled. And I like THOSE kits, not the Bullpups, Sidewinders, and AAMRAMs. Those are a dime-a-dozen rockets. My Matra Super 530 and Osiris MPM are things I am really proud of. And they look very little like anything else at a launch. The Matra's fins were not 'easy' and its all my craftsmanship (or lack thereof) that made them work.

So if you have em, and you hate them, and you want to give them away to make room for other ktis, please send them to me for a nice home. I'll be MORE than happy to take them off your hands cheap (real cheap cause like I said, I keep shoveling money at Uncle Mike!).



(hmmm.... two days later and no one has taken me up on my offer... drats. )

Cheers,
Jeff

Last edited by gdjsky01 : 03-27-2011 at 12:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-28-2011, 09:47 AM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,515
Default

I do NOT mind "builders" kits AT ALL, quite the contrary. What I do mind is kits that One, do not build as shown on the headercard with what is included in the bag (i.e. no decals is NEVER acceptable), and TWO when I have to replace many of the materials (minimum the crappy/spongy balsa and thin-walled motor tubes) just to have what I deem to be a decent build. Use of a lot of paper adapters instead of cones/adapters of proper shape in balsa or plastic is a CHEAP bush-league short cut as well. At BEST these should be advertised as model rockets capable of flying on low-end MPR motors. They do NOT meet my standard for material quality nor strength to be labeled mid-power by ANY sense of imagination. Low value for $$ when considering all the parts that MUST be replaced.

What do I consider Mid Power ? Capable of handling just about any motor below an H128.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, TURMOIL, FIASCOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-28-2011, 09:55 AM
sandman's Avatar
sandman sandman is offline
Custom Cone, Kit & Decal Maker
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Way North of Detroit
Posts: 5,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghrocketman
I do NOT mind "builders" kits AT ALL, quite the contrary. What I do mind is kits that One, do not build as shown on the headercard with what is included in the bag (i.e. no decals is NEVER acceptable), and TWO when I have to replace many of the materials (minimum the crappy/spongy balsa and thin-walled motor tubes) just to have what I deem to be a decent build. Use of a lot of paper adapters instead of cones/adapters of proper shape in balsa or plastic is a CHEAP bush-league short cut as well. At BEST these should be advertised as model rockets capable of flying on low-end MPR motors. They do NOT meet my standard for material quality nor strength to be labeled mid-power by ANY sense of imagination. Low value for $$ when considering all the parts that MUST be replaced.

What do I consider Mid Power ? Capable of handling just about any motor below an H128.


I had a push for a while to make more decals for TLP kits but because of the lack of availability I have lost my incentive so to speak.

It hardly seems worth the effort to make decals for kits that aren't being produced.
__________________
"I'm a sandman. I've never killed anyone. I terminate runners when their time is up." Logan from "Logan's Run"

http://sandmandecals.com/
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-28-2011, 10:05 AM
UMRS's Avatar
UMRS UMRS is offline
Rocket Huckster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Plymouth, Michigan
Posts: 1,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman
I had a push for a while to make more decals for TLP kits but because of the lack of availability I have lost my incentive so to speak.

It hardly seems worth the effort to make decals for kits that aren't being produced.



Agreed bad business model, making things for other things that arent being produced.
__________________
Low Prices, Fast Delivery. The Webs #1 Rocket Shop

YORF the rocketry forum where vendors can actually post in the vendors section.

TRF Banned and proud


Uncle Mikes Rocket Shack

Any Questions/Comments Click To Email Us
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-28-2011, 12:26 PM
kevinj's Avatar
kevinj kevinj is offline
Not so Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghrocketman
They do NOT meet my standard for material quality nor strength to be labeled mid-power by ANY sense of imagination.

What do I consider Mid Power ? Capable of handling just about any motor below an H128.


I'm glad you posted this, as it demonstrates exactly where the issue lies.

You have some standard that everyone else has to meet that is different from the commonly accepted standard. If you choose to fly a model designed for 24mm D-E-F motors on something else and have to modify the kit to do it, that's your deal, not the kit maker's. If you build to the instructions and fly on the reccomended motors, then the kits are fine.

kj
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-28-2011, 12:57 PM
cas2047's Avatar
cas2047 cas2047 is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MA, NH
Posts: 1,532
Default

One thing we still don't know for sure is whether or not the company is still in business or not. It sounds like nobody is receiving any new kits from them so I'm guessing they may not be, but whether thats a permenant thing or a temporary thing is still unknown.

I sent an email to the owner today to ask if they are still in business and selling kits. I'll weigh in if I hear anything back...
__________________
I plan ahead that way I don't have to do anything right now.

Oh by the way, I'm not here just for the "olde" rocket discussions.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024